NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA RTX A4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 98% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 10752 versus 6144
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 121168
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 420.465
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 32.297
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 162.131
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1895.111
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 22050
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 22050
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4651 versus 2598
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 6144 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 16 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 121168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 22050 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4651 versus 2598 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19568 versus 4237
- 11.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 versus 86
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 5 Oct 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 19568 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1021 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 121168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4651 | 2598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 12 Apr 2021 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 102 | 105 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAA30
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
