NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- 3.7x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 102535
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 326.494
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 31.684
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 189.702 versus 159.275
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 versus 1506.874
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 versus 10965
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 2944 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 102535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 versus 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 versus 1506.874 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 versus 10965 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 versus 4237
- 10.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 86
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 23142
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3712
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3353
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 23142
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3712
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 18811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 912 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 102535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 10965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 94 | 97 |
| Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
