NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 13 September 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Environ 93% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 384
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 versus 17019
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 58.805
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 785.059
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 3.961
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 53.111
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 222.15
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 5088
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2173
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 5088
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 420 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 384 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 versus 17019 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 58.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 785.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 3.961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 53.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 222.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 37924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 99.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 523.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 13 September 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 851 | 349 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA T400 avec des autres
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAT400 vs
AppleM2 8-core
