NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 915 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 versus 10427
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 22.828
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 210.585
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 3.427
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 28.662
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 162.83
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 4938
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 4938
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 10 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 915 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 versus 10427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 3.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Environ 90% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 420 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2173
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 2173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 420 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 10427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 10 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 851 | 853 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA T400 avec des autres
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAT400 vs
AppleM2 8-core
