NVIDIA TITAN Xp versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 76% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 900 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 160.5 billion / sec
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2304
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 4,156 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 90% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 versus 7986
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 590
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72551 versus 23233
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 versus 57.735
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.321 versus 1269.688
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 versus 5.505
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.083 versus 37.407
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 versus 174.323
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10966 versus 9064
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10966 versus 9064
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 April 2017 versus 23 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 863 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 160.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2304 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 4,156 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 versus 7986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 versus 23233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 versus 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 versus 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 versus 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 versus 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 versus 174.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 versus 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 versus 9064 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3686
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3686
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2777 versus 2372
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 versus 2372 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | 7986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 | 23233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | 174.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 | 2777 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | GP102 | GK110 |
Date de sortie | 6 April 2017 | 23 May 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $649 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 225 | 451 |
Prix maintenant | $1,200 | $740.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.97 | 12.94 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 863 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 7,080 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2304 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |