NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 2513.321
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 43.083
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3686
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3686
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 6 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 43.083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 versus 12751
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 806
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72500 versus 62649
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 versus 187.131
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 versus 15.882
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 versus 901.388
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10128 versus 5990
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 versus 12751 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72500 versus 62649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 versus 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 versus 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 versus 901.388 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10128 versus 5990 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12751 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 806 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62649 | 72500 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 256.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 19.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 43.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1139.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5990 | 10128 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 218 | 220 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,200 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz |