NVIDIA TITAN Xp versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 367.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 11,758 gflops
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 10008 MHz
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 versus 12267
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 439
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72551 versus 62287
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10966 versus 9538
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10966 versus 9538
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 April 2017 versus 13 September 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 11,758 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 10008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 versus 12267 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 439 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 versus 62287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 versus 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 versus 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 versus 256.103
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 versus 2513.321
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 43.083
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 versus 1139.382
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 12 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 versus 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 versus 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 versus 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 versus 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3686 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | 12267 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 439 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 | 62287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | 300.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | 3559.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | 19.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | 204.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | 1214.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP102 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 6 April 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $5,699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 225 | 234 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,200 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 3840 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |

