NVIDIA Tesla M10 versus NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M10 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M10
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 85% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 557 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1306 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4x 8 GB versus 2x 8 GB
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3693 versus 886
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 versus 1791
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3693 versus 886
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 versus 1791
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 30 August 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 557 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4x 8 GB versus 2x 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 versus 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 versus 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 versus 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 versus 1791 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M60
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2x 2048 versus 4x 640
- Environ 45% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4x 1,672 gflops
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7652 versus 3046
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 versus 385
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 29272 versus 10282
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 versus 46.191
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 versus 814.192
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.038 versus 50.918
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 314.404 versus 180.026
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8663 versus 5204
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8663 versus 5204
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 4x 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7652 versus 3046 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 versus 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29272 versus 10282 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 versus 46.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 versus 814.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 versus 50.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 versus 180.026 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 versus 5204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 versus 5204 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3046 | 7652 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 517 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10282 | 29272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 114.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 1451.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 70.038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 314.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | 8663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 1791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 626 | 475 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4x 640 | 2x 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4x 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4x 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla M10 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4000
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIATesla M10 vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
