NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1063 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 3,789 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 84.381
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1389.754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 8.872
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 481.76
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 9448
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 9448
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 84.381 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1389.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 8.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 9448 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 31552
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 99.574
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 31552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 99.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3341 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31552 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 84.381 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1389.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 22 December 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 355 | 483 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 274 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
