NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 54% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1664
- Environ 39% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 3,920 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 97% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 858.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37758 versus 28476
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 105.107
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1225.96
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 8.76
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 35.714
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 489.884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1664 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 3,920 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 versus 28476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 8.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 489.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9638 versus 8926
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 versus 395
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 11409
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 11409
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9638 versus 8926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 versus 395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 11409 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8926 | 9638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 769 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 | 28476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 489.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3626 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 362 | 363 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1664 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
IntelArc A370M
