NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla P4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 855 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 392
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 40073 versus 37864
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 147.62
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1791.761
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 9.457
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 99.574
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 523.29
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 392 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40073 versus 37864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 99.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 523.29 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9065 versus 7775
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 2238
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9065 versus 7775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7775 | 9065 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 392 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40073 | 37864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 99.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 523.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3341 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP104 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 357 | 354 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
