NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 4,981 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 165 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 858.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37758 versus 34824
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 110.006
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1348.307
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 9.194
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 37.443
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 477.015
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 9566
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 9566
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 4,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 165 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 versus 34824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1216 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11104 versus 8926
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 versus 395
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11104 versus 8926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 versus 395 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8926 | 11104 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 792 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 | 34824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 362 | 364 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 1216 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
IntelArc A370M
