NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 170.1 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,443 gflops versus 4,981 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 165 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 858.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37782 versus 34883
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 110.006
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 versus 1348.307
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 versus 9.194
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 37.443
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 versus 477.015
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 9566
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 9566
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 19 September 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s versus 144 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops versus 4,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 165 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37782 versus 34883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 versus 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 versus 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 versus 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1216 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11105 versus 8920
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 390
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1216 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11105 versus 8920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 390 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 | 11105 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37782 | 34883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP104 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 361 | 363 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |