NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 10000 MHz
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18544 versus 10616
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 versus 592
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 61276
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 127.622
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 3026.812
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 18.798
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 119.936
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 910.721
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1781
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 10000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 versus 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 versus 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 18544 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 785 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 270 | 124 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 14000 MHz |