NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 9.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10684 versus 9396
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 versus 114.288
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 2911.861
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 10.947
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 118.411
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 683.568
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 11675
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 11675
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10684 versus 9396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 versus 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 11675 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 821 versus 592
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 1781
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 1781
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 821 versus 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10684 | 9396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 821 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU104 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 272 | 269 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 6,200 million |
Unités de Compute | 44 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 184.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |