AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1086 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 3,789 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 84.413
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 101.929
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 22 December 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 3,789 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 vs 84.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 vs 101.929 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 vs 25596
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 vs 1362.14
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 vs 6.025
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 vs 250.267
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1565
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 vs 5579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 vs 25596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 vs 1362.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 vs 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 vs 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5489 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | 84.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | 1390.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | 7.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Tahiti |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 22 December 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 477 | 464 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Length | 274 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |