AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 713 MHz vs 557 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 513
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 70.038
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1691 vs 886
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1691 vs 886
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 vs 70.038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 vs 886 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1086 MHz
- 17.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1792
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 3,892 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 vs 5558
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29243 vs 25596
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 87.861
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 vs 1362.14
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 vs 6.025
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 314.404 vs 250.267
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8663 vs 5579
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1791 vs 1565
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8663 vs 5579
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1791 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1086 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 3,892 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7551 vs 5558 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29243 vs 25596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 vs 87.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 vs 1362.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 vs 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 vs 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5558 | 7551 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | 29243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 1791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 487 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 557 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |