AMD PRO A12-9800 vs AMD A10-9700
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A12-9800 und AMD A10-9700 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-9800
- Etwa 11% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1686 vs 1613
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3705 vs 3544
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 20.497
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 vs 227.004
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.533
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 27.928
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 87.933
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 vs 1613 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 vs 3544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 vs 20.497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 vs 227.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 vs 1.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 vs 27.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 vs 87.933 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9700
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1358 vs 1176
- 5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 vs 477
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7174 vs 1715
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1358 vs 1176
- 5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 vs 477
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7174 vs 1715
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 27 July 2017 vs 3 October 2016 |
| Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1358 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7174 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1358 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7174 vs 1715 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800
CPU 2: AMD A10-9700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A12-9800 | AMD A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 | 1613 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 | 3544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | 20.497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | 227.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | 1.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | 27.928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | 87.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | 1358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | 7174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | 1358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 | 7174 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | AMD A10-9700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 3 October 2016 | 27 July 2017 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAUM44AB | AD9700AGM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 991 | 922 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $90 | |
| OPN PIB | AD9700AGABBOX | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $79.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 20.04 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1108 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | Radeon R7 Series |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A12-9800 mit anderen
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-9300T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-10100T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4500
