Intel Celeron G1820 vs Intel Core i3-4130
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron G1820 und Intel Core i3-4130 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron G1820
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 2% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 53 Watt vs 54 Watt
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.452 vs 1.973
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.945 vs 0.496
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | December 2013 vs September 2013 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 54 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 vs 1.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 vs 0.496 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-4130
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 26% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1883 vs 1530
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3325 vs 1699
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 766 vs 565
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1651 vs 1036
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 33.765 vs 28.651
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.259 vs 0.235
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.802 vs 2.149
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 820 vs 612
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2010 vs 1320
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3185 vs 2399
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 820 vs 612
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2010 vs 1320
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3185 vs 2399
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1883 vs 1530 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3325 vs 1699 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 766 vs 565 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1651 vs 1036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.765 vs 28.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.259 vs 0.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.802 vs 2.149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 820 vs 612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2010 vs 1320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3185 vs 2399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 820 vs 612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2010 vs 1320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3185 vs 2399 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4130
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1530 | 1883 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1699 | 3325 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 | 766 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1036 | 1651 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 | 1.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 | 33.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.235 | 0.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 | 0.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.149 | 2.802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 612 | 820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1320 | 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 | 3185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 612 | 820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1320 | 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 | 3185 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i3-4130 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Haswell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | December 2013 | September 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $110 | $120 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2443 | 2101 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $75 | $139.99 |
| Processor Number | G1820 | i3-4130 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.83 | 10.09 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C | 72°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | 1400 million |
Speicher |
||
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 21.3 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.05 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 1.7 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
| Device ID | 0x41E | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 53 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2013C |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | Up to 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron G1820 mit anderen
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i7-2600S
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i5-2500K
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA6-3650
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA8-5500B
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDAthlon X4 760K
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCeleron J3455E
