Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 und Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Speicher. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.676 vs 0.587
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.248 vs 1.175
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 vs 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 vs 1.175 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1283 vs 1186
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2479 vs 2171
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 382
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 1222
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.945 vs 24.212
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.162 vs 0.138
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.276 vs 4.253
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1283 vs 1186 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2479 vs 2171 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 382 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1400 vs 1222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.945 vs 24.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.162 vs 0.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.276 vs 4.253 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1186 | 1283 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2171 | 2479 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 444 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1222 | 1400 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 | 30.945 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 | 1.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 | 4.276 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
Startdatum | Q3'09 | August 2008 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2977 | 2987 |
Processor Number | Q9505 | Q9650 |
Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $54.49 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 22.69 | |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Matrizengröße | 164 mm2 | 214 mm2 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C | 71.4°C |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 456 million | 820 million |
VID-Spannungsbereich | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 6144 KB (per die) | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz | |
Kompatibilität |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Unterstützte Sockel | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB-Parität | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Speicher |
||
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |