Intel Core M-5Y10c vs Intel Core i5-4278U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core M-5Y10c und Intel Core i5-4278U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core M-5Y10c
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 5.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 4.5 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.294 vs 2.179
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 99.709 vs 35.732
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.643 vs 0.258
- 6.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.247 vs 1.045
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.666 vs 2.564
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 December 2014 vs 21 July 2014 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB vs 3 MB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 vs 2.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 vs 35.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 vs 0.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 vs 1.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 vs 2.564 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4278U
- Etwa 55% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.10 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntemperatur: 100 °C vs 95 °C
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1708 vs 1111
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2821 vs 1892
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 vs 471
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1505 vs 981
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1145 vs 857
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2044 vs 1613
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2750
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1145 vs 857
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2044 vs 1613
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2750
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.10 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100 °C vs 95 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1708 vs 1111 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2821 vs 1892 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 687 vs 471 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1505 vs 981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1145 vs 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2044 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1145 vs 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2044 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2750 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core M-5Y10c
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4278U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Core i5-4278U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 | 1708 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1892 | 2821 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | 687 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | 1505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | 2.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | 35.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | 0.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | 1.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 | 2.564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 2044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 2044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 | 3331 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Core i5-4278U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | 1 December 2014 | 21 July 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $281 | $315 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1968 | 1969 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $281 | |
| Processor Number | 5Y10c | i5-4278U |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 2.95 | |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 800 MHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 82 mm | 181 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.00 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1300 Million | 1300 Million |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L-1333, 1600; LPDDR3-1333, 1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x161E | 0xA2E |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel® Iris® Graphics 5100 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3200x2000@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3280x2000@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1234 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2 |
| PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core M-5Y10c mit anderen
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-4278U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-7300U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDR-272F
