Intel Core M-5Y10c versus Intel Core i5-4278U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core M-5Y10c et Intel Core i5-4278U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core M-5Y10c
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- Environ 33% plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 5.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.5 Watt versus 28 Watt
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.294 versus 2.179
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 99.709 versus 35.732
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.643 versus 0.258
- 6.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.247 versus 1.045
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.666 versus 2.564
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 December 2014 versus 21 July 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Cache L3 | 4 MB versus 3 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt versus 28 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 versus 2.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 versus 35.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 versus 0.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 versus 1.045 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 versus 2.564 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-4278U
- Environ 55% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.10 GHz versus 2.00 GHz
- Environ 5% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100 °C versus 95 °C
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1706 versus 1109
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2818 versus 1887
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 versus 471
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1505 versus 981
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1145 versus 857
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2044 versus 1613
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2750
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1145 versus 857
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2044 versus 1613
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2750
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.10 GHz versus 2.00 GHz |
Température de noyau maximale | 100 °C versus 95 °C |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1706 versus 1109 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2818 versus 1887 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 687 versus 471 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1505 versus 981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1145 versus 857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2044 versus 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1145 versus 857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2044 versus 1613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2750 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core M-5Y10c
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4278U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Core i5-4278U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1109 | 1706 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1887 | 2818 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | 687 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | 1505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | 2.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | 35.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | 0.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | 1.045 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 | 2.564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 | 1145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 2044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 | 1145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 2044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 | 3331 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Core i5-4278U | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | Haswell |
Date de sortie | 1 December 2014 | 21 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $281 | $315 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1968 | 1969 |
Prix maintenant | $281 | |
Processor Number | 5Y10c | i5-4278U |
Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.95 | |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 800 MHz | 2.60 GHz |
Taille de dé | 82 mm | 181 mm |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Cache L3 | 4 MB | 3 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 95 °C | 100 °C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.00 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1300 Million | 1300 Million |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L-1333, 1600; LPDDR3-1333, 1600 |
Graphiques |
||
Device ID | 0x161E | 0xA2E |
Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel® Iris® Graphics 5100 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3200x2000@60Hz |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | 3280x2000@60Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1234 | FCBGA1168 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 12 | 12 |
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2 |
PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |