AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD FirePro M5950 und AMD Radeon HD 6770M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro M5950
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1314 vs 964
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 323.699 vs 234.842
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.535 vs 0.393
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.137 vs 15.475
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.638 vs 33.71
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 vs 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 vs 572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 323.699 vs 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.535 vs 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.137 vs 15.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.638 vs 33.71 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3348 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- 7.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 1135
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.817 vs 1.199
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2590
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2590
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 vs 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 vs 1.199 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 vs 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 vs 2590 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5950
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M5950 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 | 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1135 | 8338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.199 | 4.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 323.699 | 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.535 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.137 | 15.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.638 | 33.71 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD FirePro M5950 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Codename | Whistler | Whistler |
Startdatum | 4 January 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 991 | 992 |
Typ | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 725 MHz | 725 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 696.0 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 480 | 480 |
Texturfüllrate | 17.4 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 716 million | 716 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | n / a | |
Formfaktor | MXM-A | |
Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 57 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 3600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |