AMD Radeon 540 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon 540 und AMD Radeon R9 M380 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon 540
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 vs 12565
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2355 vs 536
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2355 vs 536
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2855
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2855
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 vs 12565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2855 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M380
- 1280x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,536 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 250x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1500 MHz vs 6 Gbps
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 248
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2773 vs 1404
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 vs 1726
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 vs 1726
| Spezifikationen | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,536 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 6 Gbps |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 248 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2773 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 vs 1726 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 248 | 509 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1404 | 2773 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 12565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 3688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon 540 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | 4th Gen GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Codename | Topaz | Strato |
| Design | AMD Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 860 | 863 |
| Typ | Notebook | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 8 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,536 gflops |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
| Leitungssysteme | 768 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 48 GTexel / s | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,080 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 48 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6 Gbps | 1500 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |


