AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon 625 und AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon 625
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 31% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 1313x mehr Texturfüllrate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1094 vs 942
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 5913
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 14.771
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 285.896
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 1.219
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 24.949
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 1759
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 2540
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 1759
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 2540
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 May 2019 vs 8 January 2013 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 vs 942 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 vs 5913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 vs 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 vs 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 vs 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 vs 24.949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 2540 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- 2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 206
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 70.423
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3215
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3215
Spezifikationen | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 vs 206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 vs 70.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3215 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | 942 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | 5913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 24.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 72.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3355 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Polaris 24 | Oland |
Startdatum | 13 May 2019 | 8 January 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1150 | 1153 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1024 MHz | 780 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz | 730 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 599.0 gflops | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Breite | IGP | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.40 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR3 |