AMD Radeon 625 versus AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1024 MHz versus 780 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1094 versus 943
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 versus 5970
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 versus 14.771
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 versus 285.896
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 versus 1.219
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 versus 24.949
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 versus 1759
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 versus 2540
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 versus 1759
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 versus 2540
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 8 January 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 versus 943 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 versus 5970 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 versus 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 versus 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 versus 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 versus 24.949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 versus 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 versus 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 versus 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 versus 2540 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 279 versus 206
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 70.423
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3215
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3215
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 versus 206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 70.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | 943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 279 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | 5970 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 24.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 72.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 24 | Oland |
Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 8 January 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1150 | 1153 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | 780 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 730 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR3 |