AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD FirePro V7900
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und AMD FirePro V7900 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 14.134
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 676.409
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 1.309
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 36.678
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 171.25
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2996
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2996
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 vs 24 May 2011 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2996 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro V7900
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 20286
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1232
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 20286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 27733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2305 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | TeraScale 3 |
Codename | Pitcairn | Cayman |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 24 May 2011 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 857 | 854 |
Typ | Workstation | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 725 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,856.0 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Texturfüllrate | 58.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,640 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 4 | |
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Formfaktor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Länge | 279 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin |