AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus AMD FirePro V7900
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD FirePro V7900 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 14.134
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 676.409
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 1.309
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 36.678
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 171.25
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 2996
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 2996
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 24 May 2011 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 2996 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V7900
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 versus 20286
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 1232
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 1232
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 versus 20286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 27733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3354 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2305 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 3 |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | Cayman |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 24 May 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 857 | 854 |
Genre | Workstation | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,856.0 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 2,640 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 279 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin |