AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD FirePro M6100
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und AMD FirePro M6100 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 39.059
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 750.731
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 3.395
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 57.283
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 166.915
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4537
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2517
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4537
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2517
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 vs 16 October 2013 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2517 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro M6100
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 20286
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1803 vs 1232
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1803 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 20286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 vs 1232 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 52486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2517 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
Codename | Pitcairn | Saturn |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 856 | 859 |
Typ | Mobile workstation | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 88 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5500 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1075 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,651 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | |
Texturfüllrate | 51.6 GTexel / s | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,080 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None |