AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und AMD Radeon HD 8790M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20353 vs 4752
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 12.759
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 465.631
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 1.576
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 28.839
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 80.418
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 2181
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2014
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 2181
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2014
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 vs 4752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2014 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1232
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 1232 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 | 4752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2014 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Pitcairn | Mars |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 842 | 846 |
Typ | Desktop | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 64 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 850 MHz | |
Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 850 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 691.2 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | |
Texturfüllrate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None |