AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20353 versus 4752
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 12.759
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 465.631
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 1.576
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 28.839
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 80.418
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 2181
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 2014
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 2181
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 2014
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 versus 4752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 2014 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 versus 1232
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 versus 1232
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 versus 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 versus 1232 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 | 4752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2014 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Pitcairn | Mars |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series |
Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 842 | 846 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |