AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 570 und NVIDIA Quadro P400 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 570
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- 7493.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 256
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 74% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 1651
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 435
- 11.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 3053
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 19.856
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 309.824
- 6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 1.38
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 25.011
- 6.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 84.489
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 2709
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 2875
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3328
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 2709
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 2875
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3328
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 vs 617
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Texturfüllrate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 256 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 1651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 vs 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 19.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 309.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 1.38 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 25.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 84.489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 vs 617 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Etwa 33% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1228 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1252 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- 133.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 679.9 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1252 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 679.9 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 1651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 19.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 309.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 1.38 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 25.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 84.489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 617 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GP107 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
| Startdatum | 18 April 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $169 | $119.99 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 405 | 983 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $149.99 | $119.99 |
| Typ | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.00 | 18.70 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1206-1244 MHz | 1252 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 926-1168 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5.1 TFLOPs | 679.9 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 | 256 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 3,300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 241 mm | 145 mm |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 224 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
