AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 66% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1465 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Etwa 46% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14448 vs 11666
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 884 vs 477
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 168.08
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1935.102
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 111.023
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 1001.496
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8497 vs 6809
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14448 vs 11666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 884 vs 477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8497 vs 6809 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Etwa 57% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 115 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76671 vs 65902
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 21.941
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 11536
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3723
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3366
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 11536
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3723
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3366
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76671 vs 65902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 vs 21.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3366 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14448 | 11666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 884 | 477 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65902 | 76671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 8055 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8497 | 6809 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Turing |
Codename | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 192 | 189 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 885 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 115 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |