AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- 1000x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 vs 6332
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 650
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 vs 20732
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 vs 75.758
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 843.503
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 5.071
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 vs 24.676
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 vs 301.168
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 8496
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3687
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 8496
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3687
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 vs 305
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 vs 25 October 2016 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 vs 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 vs 305 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Etwa 19% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1392 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1392 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- 2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 305 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Codename | Polaris 20 | GP107 |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 358 | 487 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $139 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $159.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 768 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Leitungssysteme | 768 | |
Texturfüllrate | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |