AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 versus 6332
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 650
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 versus 20732
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 75.758
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 843.503
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 5.071
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 24.676
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 301.168
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3687
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3687
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 25 October 2016 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 versus 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 versus 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1392 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 358 | 487 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,300 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |