AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 42% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1168 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Etwa 13% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Etwa 75% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 vs 3063
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 438
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 vs 10721
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 vs 31.935
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 539.966
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 2.344
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 vs 35.841
- 9.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 vs 64.308
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 4184
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3683
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3333
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 4184
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3683
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3333
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 vs 389
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 vs 25 January 2011 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 vs 3063 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 vs 10721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 vs 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 vs 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 vs 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 vs 64.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 vs 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 vs 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 vs 389 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 3063 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 10721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 64.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 389 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Codename | Polaris 20 | GF114 |
Startdatum | 15 October 2018 | 25 January 2011 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 358 | 799 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $249 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $138 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1284 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1168 MHz | 823 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 1,950 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,263.4 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | |
Texturfüllrate | 52.7 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 229 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 128.3 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 |