AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 4008 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 versus 3063
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 438
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 versus 10721
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 31.935
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 539.966
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 2.344
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 35.841
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 64.308
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3333
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3333
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 389
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 25 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 4008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 versus 3063 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 438 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 versus 10721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 389 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 3063 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 438 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 10721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 25 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 358 | 799 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 1,950 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 229 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
