AMD Radeon Vega 10 vs AMD FirePro W600
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 10 und AMD FirePro W600 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 10
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9466 vs 6205
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.485 vs 17.708
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.218 vs 1.857
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.275 vs 36.592
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.274 vs 93.116
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3082 vs 2331
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3402 vs 1555
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3082 vs 2331
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3402 vs 1555
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 26 October 2017 vs 13 June 2012 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9466 vs 6205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.485 vs 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 vs 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 vs 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 vs 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 vs 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 vs 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 vs 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 vs 1555 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FirePro W600
- 3.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 4000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1683 vs 1543
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 358
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 vs 357.982
| Spezifikationen | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1683 vs 1543 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 vs 358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 vs 357.982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3250 vs 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3250 vs 3235 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 10
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1543 | 1683 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 591 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9466 | 6205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.485 | 17.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 357.982 | 585.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.218 | 1.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.275 | 36.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.274 | 93.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3082 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3402 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3235 | 3250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3082 | 2331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3402 | 1555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3235 | 3250 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 797 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon Vega 10 | AMD FirePro W600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
| Codename | Vega Raven Ridge | Cape Verde |
| Startdatum | 26 October 2017 | 13 June 2012 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 902 | 904 |
| Typ | Laptop | Workstation |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1400 MHz | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 750 MHz | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 768.0 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 24 GTexel / s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,500 million | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Speicherbandbreite | 64 GB / s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Länge | 163 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |

