AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 3 und AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, Speicher, API-Unterstützung. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Etwa 30% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1579 vs 889
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 303
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8803 vs 3963
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 vs 10.049
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 365.4 vs 183.156
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 0.75
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 18.933
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 60.006
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1514 vs 1412
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2433 vs 2111
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3174
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1514 vs 1412
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2433 vs 2111
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3174
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 705 vs 418
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1579 vs 889 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 vs 3963 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 vs 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 vs 183.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 vs 0.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 vs 18.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 vs 60.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 vs 2111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 vs 1412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 vs 2111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3174 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 vs 418 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 1579 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 8803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 365.4 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 2.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 37.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 132.07 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 6729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 6729 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 705 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Owl | Owl |
Startdatum | 13 February 2018 | 13 February 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1267 | 932 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 384.0 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 192 | |
Texturfüllrate | 12 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,940 million | 4,940 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | IGP |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |