Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 4600 und AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 45 Watt vs 125 Watt
| Startdatum | 3 June 2013 vs 15 February 2012 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- 8x mehr Texturfüllrate: 40 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 32x mehr Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 20
- 25.6x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,280 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 vs 630
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 314
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 3210
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 vs 8.844
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 506.712 vs 171.17
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 vs 1.115
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 vs 10.385
- 12.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 vs 12.361
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 vs 988
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 1702
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 2808
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 vs 988
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 1702
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 2808
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 vs 194
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 40 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 20 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,280 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 vs 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 vs 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 vs 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 vs 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 vs 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 vs 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 vs 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 vs 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 vs 194 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 711 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Codename | Haswell GT2 | Cape Verde |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2013 | 15 February 2012 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1359 | 557 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1250 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 400 MHz | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 50 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 20 | 640 |
| Texturfüllrate | 5 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 392 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Länge | 210 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 72 GB/s | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1125 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||

