Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 125 Watt
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 125 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 40 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 20
- 25.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,280 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 versus 630
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 versus 314
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 3210
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 versus 8.844
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 506.712 versus 171.17
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 versus 1.115
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 versus 10.385
- 12.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 versus 12.361
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 versus 988
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 1702
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 2808
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 versus 988
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 1702
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 2808
- 3.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 versus 194 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 711 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 557 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
