NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) und Intel HD Graphics 4000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 89% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1228 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Etwa 59% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1670 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 24x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 16
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 347
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 194
- 18.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 538
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 vs 8.712
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 170.785 vs 155.638
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 vs 0.931
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 vs 7.36
- 13.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 12.009
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 754
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1492
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2392
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 754
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1492
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2392
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 vs 14 May 2012 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 16 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 vs 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 vs 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 vs 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 vs 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 vs 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 vs 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 vs 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2392 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Generation 7.0 |
| Codename | N17P-G1 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 | 14 May 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 874 | 1501 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $59.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 16 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 33.6 gflops | |
| Texturfüllrate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,200 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.0 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |

