NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 89% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 59% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 347
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 194
- 18.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 538
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 8.712
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 170.785 versus 155.638
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 0.931
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.937 versus 7.36
- 13.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 12.009
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 754
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2392
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 754
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 16 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2392 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | N17P-G1 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 14 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1501 |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |

