NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 24% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:954 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 6.4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 19 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 8.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 117
- 13.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 108.2
- 15.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 119.7
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 27 March 2014 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 vs 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 119.7 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 6.7x mehr Texturfüllrate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1536 vs 192
- 6.7x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,448 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5000x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 vs 6.705
- 10x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 vs 100.391
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 vs 0.441
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 vs 8.146
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 126.579 vs 20.64
- 7.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 977
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 1494
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 1833
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 1536 vs 192 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,448 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 vs 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 vs 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 vs 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 vs 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 vs 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 1833 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 1002.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 54.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 119.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Codename | GK208B | GK104 |
| Startdatum | 27 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1488 | 879 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $34.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 771 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | 192 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 366.3 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
| Leitungssysteme | 192 | 1536 |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 292 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 797 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| Display-Anschlüsse | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Höhe | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1.8 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 mit anderen
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
