NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 771 MHz
- 6.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 8.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 117
- 13.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 108.2
- 15.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 119.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 119.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 192
- 6.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 versus 6.705
- 10x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 versus 100.391
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 versus 0.441
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 8.146
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 126.579 versus 20.64
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 977
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 1494
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 1833
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 versus 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 versus 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 versus 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 versus 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 1002.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 54.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 119.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 879 |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
