NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 192
- 2.4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 49 Watt vs 116 Watt
- Etwa 56% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1600 MHz vs 1026 MHz
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 vs 322
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 June 2014 vs 15 March 2011 |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 192 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 692.7 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 116 Watt |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 vs 322 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.6x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 830
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 253
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 2902
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 10.872
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 166.832
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 0.817
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 vs 12.415
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 36.916
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1951
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1693
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1951
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1693
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 vs 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 vs 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 vs 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 vs 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1693 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 322 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Codename | GF108 | GF116 |
| Startdatum | 18 June 2014 | 15 March 2011 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $59.99 | $149 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1311 | 1019 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $54.99 | $287.59 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 20.48 | 7.49 |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 700 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 692.7 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 192 |
| Texturfüllrate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 49 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 585 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 192 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 100 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Länge | 145 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | One 6-pin |
| Busunterstützung | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI-Optionen | 2-way | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz | 1026 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
