NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1026 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 327 versus 322
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 15 March 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 116 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1026 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 versus 322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 versus 830
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 253
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 versus 2902
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 10.872
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 versus 166.832
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 versus 0.817
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 versus 12.415
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 versus 36.916
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 1951
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 1693
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 1951
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 1693
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 versus 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 versus 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 versus 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 versus 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 versus 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 versus 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 1693 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 15 March 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1019 |
| Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $287.59 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 7.49 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1026 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7600G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 5
