NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 3.1x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 93962 vs 74179
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 19571
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 19571
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8346 vs 3503
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 vs 74179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3717 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 vs 3503 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 96% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 64% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 10.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18559 vs 13617
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 572
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18559 vs 13617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 vs 572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13617 | 18559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 785 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 | 74179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 | 3503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU104B | TU102 |
Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 126 | 124 |
Typ | Laptop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1080 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 2x 8-pin |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 352.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |