NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 93962 versus 74179
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 versus 19571
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3717
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 versus 19571
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8346 versus 3503
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 versus 74179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 versus 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 versus 3503 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 96% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1080 MHz
- 10.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18544 versus 13605
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 versus 570
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1080 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 versus 13605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 versus 570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13605 | 18544 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 785 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 | 74179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 | 3503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104B | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 125 | 124 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1080 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 352.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |

