NVIDIA Quadro K420 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro K420 und NVIDIA Quadro K620 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Etwa 21% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1058 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Etwa 28% höhere Texturfüllrate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 192
- 2.6x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 863.2 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
- 2048x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- Etwa 1% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 733
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 288
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 1843
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 6
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 186.605
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.433
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 vs 10.365
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 17.75
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1245
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 598
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1241
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1245
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 598
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1241
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1058 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 192 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 863.2 gflops vs 336.4 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1241 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 733 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1843 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | Maxwell |
Codename | GK107 | GM107 |
Startdatum | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $96.67 | $189.89 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1467 | 953 |
Jetzt kaufen | $89.99 | $189.93 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.27 | 15.23 |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 876 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 336.4 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 192 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 14.02 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 41 Watt | 41 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1124 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | 4 |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 160 mm | 160 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Breite | 1" (2.5 cm) | 1" (2.5 cm) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB / 2 GB | 2 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |