NVIDIA Quadro K420 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 876 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
- 2048x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 versus 733
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 versus 288
- 3.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 versus 1843
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 versus 6
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 versus 186.605
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 versus 0.433
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 versus 10.365
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 versus 17.75
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1245
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 598
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 1241
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1245
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 598
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 1241
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 336.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 versus 733 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 versus 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 versus 1843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 versus 6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 versus 186.605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 versus 0.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 versus 10.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 versus 17.75 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 1241 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 733 | 2220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 480 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1843 | 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 297.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | 1.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $96.67 | $189.89 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1467 | 953 |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | $189.93 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.27 | 15.23 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | 4 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | 1" (2.5 cm) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB / 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K420 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
